How We Can Design Autonomous Systems for Values with Steven Umbrello
Steven Umbrello is the Managing Director at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies with a research focus on responsible innovation and the ethical design methods for emerging technologies. His work focuses on ethics and design thinking around building AI systems, and how policy can shape the future of these autonomous systems.
Steven Umbrello’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenumbrello/
Steven Umbrello’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/StevenUmbro
Steven Umbrello’s Website: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015/full
Podcast website: https://www.humainpodcast.com
YouTube Full Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxvclFvpPvFM9_RxcNg1rag
Support and Social Media:
– Check out the sponsors above, it’s the best way to support this podcast
– Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/humain/creators
– Twitter: https://twitter.com/dyakobovitch
– Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/humainpodcast/
– LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidyakobovitch/
– Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HumainPodcast/
– HumAIn Website Articles: https://www.humainpodcast.com/blog/
Here’s the timestamps for the episode:
(00:00) – Introduction
(02:17) – Ethics clarification of what would normally be abstract, philosophical concepts like human values to engineers can be implemented into design requirements.
(03:39) – Design has to be approached so that engineering can incorporate human values, which are often abstract, into technological design.
(05:20) – The difficulty with AI and with many technologies in a globalized world is that technology has cross-cultural, cross-domain, cross-border impacts. So, it’s about trying to incorporate different understandings of values from across the globe into a single technology. These are some of the difficulties that designers are facing right now.
(10:13) – Technology is not purely deterministic. Nor is society purely constructive and nor is technology purely instrumental. It’s just a neutral tool. It doesn’t embody any type of values whatsoever. And that really is important, because that means that the decisions that engineers make today, as designers, philosophers, do have a real substantive impact into the future.
(21:00) – The debate on whether we should ban or not ban autonomous weapon systems.
(21:35) – Technological innovations have always played a key role in military operations. And autonomous weapon systems, at least within the last few years have been receiving asymmetric attention, both in public and, as well, academic discussions.
(32:42) – Scientists should not apologize for, but show the nuance in debate that level five autonomy in and of itself is not the problematic point of interest, but rather what type of system has this level five autonomy.
(46:52) – For those who are interested in the philosophical foundations of meaningful human control, or even value sensitive design more generally in following the debate on the prohibition of AWS they can watch many of the online multilateral meetings, both hosted by the UN and outside their auspices as they take place. People can check out Human Rights Watch and the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots for news on these events.